Accessibility & compliance

Accessibility isn’t a feature. It’s infrastructure.

Treating accessibility as a late-stage checklist creates repeatable failure: new content breaks patterns, components drift, and exposure returns.

We align remediation to structure — templates, CMS behavior, and validation — so improvements survive real editorial use.

  • List Item

  • List Item

  • List Item

Structural fixes and validation—not overlays or checkbox audits.

What’s actually at stake

WCAG 2.2 AA gaps aren’t abstract “nice to haves.” They show up as broken forms, unreadable focus, keyboard traps, and content types your team can’t publish accessibly. Exposure (legal, reputational, procurement) varies by sector — we help you prioritize and fix with clear severity, not fear-mongering.

‍

Disclaimer: We provide technical accessibility services; we do not provide legal advice.

Scope of engagement

  • Audits grounded in WCAG 2.2 AA and practical Webflow constraints
  • Remediation planning — what to fix first and why
  • Structured fixes at component and template levels where possible
  • Validation testing on critical flows
  • Executive-readable summaries for stakeholders who won’t read issue tickets

What you can hold

  • Audit report with severity and affected user impact framing
  • Remediation roadmap (sequenced, not a flat backlog)
  • Re-test notes after fixes
  • Governance notes for content and releases

Why BM Web Studio?

  • Webflow-native thinking — we don’t pretend every fix is a generic HTML patch.
  • Structural lens — patterns repeat; fix the pattern, not only one page.
  • Former QA discipline — verification is part of the definition of done.
  • No overlay theater — we don’t sell bolt-on widgets as compliance.

Fit

  • Organizations with procurement or grant language referencing accessibility
  • Teams mid-migration who need remediation integrated into the rebuild
  • Post-launch sites with drift — audits that need a follow-through partner

Disqualifiers

  • Overlay-only or “quick certify” expectations
  • No access to CMS or codebase to fix root causes
  • Budget scoped for a single PDF with no implementation runway

Reduce exposure. Build it right.

Start a projectMigration assessment

Frequently Asked Questions

Do you guarantee WCAG compliance?

We align engineering to WCAG 2.2 AA; formal legal compliance depends on context beyond the site alone.

How do you prioritize issues?

Severity, user impact, and effort — with your release constraints.

Can you work with our legal counsel?

We provide technical findings; counsel interprets obligation.

What about PDFs?

Addressed explicitly in scope; often a major nonprofit exposure vector.

How does this relate to the migration assessment?

Larger rebuilds often pair remediation with migration; the planner’s Compliance Exposure index helps sequence work — not a substitute for a full audit.

Do you support VPAT or procurement questionnaires?

We can document technical posture and remediation status; procurement language should match your counsel’s requirements.