Catch what launch week shouldn’t find
QA & technical audits are structured reviews before (or right after) go-live: flows, CMS behavior, front-end integrity, performance signals, and accessibility cross-checks. The goal is risk reduction — clear findings, clear order of operations — not a generic “everything is fine” PDF.
List Item
List Item
List Item
Why sites ship with hidden defects
- Compressed timelines skip structural checks
- Staging ≠ production — data, edge cases, and integrations differ
- CMS freedom without guardrails breaks templates
- “Looks fine” ignores keyboard, forms, and error states
Skipping structured QA means launch-week fire drills, fixes that introduce new regressions, and accessibility problems that show up in public flows first — not in your issue tracker. The cost is rarely the audit; it’s the rework and credibility hit after go-live.
In scope (typical)
- Critical user flows — sign-up, donate, apply, contact, search (as applicable)
- Template and component consistency across breakpoints
- CMS sanity: required fields, relationship integrity, editor guardrails
- Performance signals relevant to the stack (not lab-score theater alone)
- Accessibility cross-check on high-traffic paths (deeper audits → Accessibility service)
- Integration touchpoints documented in scope (forms, analytics, embeds)
Boundaries
- Penetration testing / full security audit — out of scope unless explicitly contracted
- Legal compliance certification
- Load testing at production scale unless agreed
- Third-party vendor bugs outside our control (we document and escalate)
What you get
- Findings with severity and reproduction notes
- Recommended fix order aligned to release risk
- Optional: re-test pass after fixes (scoped)
When to bring us in
- Pre-launch — 2–4 weeks before target (varies by site size)
- Major release — new templates, donation flow, or CMS overhaul
- Post-migration — before you turn off legacy monitoring
BM Web Studio lens
- Structural QA — we care about patterns, not only pixel nits
- Webflow-aware — Designer constraints and Code Components in view
- Honest scope — we say what we didn’t test as clearly as what we did
Fit
- For: Internal teams and agencies needing an independent pass before stakeholders or donors hit the site.
- Not for: “Certify everything” with no time for fixes — QA is wasted if nothing can ship.
Validate before you celebrate launch
Frequently Asked Questions
How long does an audit take?
Scoped by URL count, flows, and environments.
Do you automate testing?
Mix of manual critical paths and tooling where appropriate — we don’t pretend automation replaces judgment.
Can this combine with an accessibility audit?
Yes; we’ll define a single report structure so you’re not duplicating fees.
What do we need from you to start?
Staging URLs, test accounts for gated flows, a prioritized flow list, and clarity on what “launch” means for your org.
How are findings delivered?
Written report plus severity-ordered backlog; format agreed in scope (e.g. sheet + narrative).
Do you test mobile and tablet?
Yes for responsive layout and touch targets on scoped pages; full device matrix is agreed explicitly when needed.